Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977537›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

Wearing an Activating Spinal Orthosis and Physical Training in Women With Osteoporosis and Back Pain: A Postintervention Follow-Up Study.

Christina Kaijser Alin, Ann-Charlotte Grahn-Kronhed, Elin Uzunel, Helena Salminen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Kaijser AlinDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Ann-Charlotte Grahn-KronhedRehab Väst, Local Health Care Services in the West of Östergötland, Mjölby, Sweden.
Elin UzunelDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Helena SalminenDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEHealthcare in Sweden · SELinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the duration of benefits on back pain and back extensor strength in women with osteoporosis who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving either exercise or wearing a spinal orthosis.

designA 6-month postintervention follow-up of women who were involved in the interventions in the RCT.

settingThe study was conducted in a primary health care center in Stockholm, Sweden.

participantsIn this follow-up study 31 women participated in the spinal orthosis group, and 31 women participated in the exercise group, with a median age of 76 years in both groups (N=62). All women were diagnosed as having osteoporosis, had back pain with or without vertebral fracture, and were 60 years or older, which were the inclusion criteria in the RCT.

interventionsThe participants received no controlled supervision. The spinal orthosis group was asked to wear the orthosis, and the training group was asked to follow an exercise program for another 6 months voluntarily.

main outcome measuresBack extensor strength was measured with a computerized device; back pain was estimated by the visual analog scale and by Borg CR-10.

resultsAfter 6 months there were no significant differences between the groups in back extensor strength or back pain. Analyses within the groups showed that achieved results during 6 months intervention in the RCT were maintained after 6 months of voluntary use of the spinal orthosis and training. In the spinal orthosis group, back extensor strength mean was 81.7 N, and back pain median was 3 mm. In the training group back extensor strength mean was 72.8 N, and back pain median was 3 mm. There were no changes for any other measurements performed.

conclusionsVoluntary use of the spinal orthosis or exercise during a 6-month follow-up period maintained the increase in back extensor muscle strength obtained during the RCT. Estimation of back pain was not influenced. This indicates that the women had continued to use the spinal orthosis and exercise.

Indexed as

ExerciseKyphosisOsteoporosisRCT, randomized controlled trialRehabilitationSpinal orthosis

Identifiers

PMID34977537
PMCPMC8683839
OpenAlexW3196727097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.