Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977516›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Video game rehabilitation for outpatient stroke (VIGoROUS): A multi-site randomized controlled trial of in-home, self-managed, upper-extremity therapy.

Lynne V Gauthier, Deborah S Nichols-Larsen, Gitendra Uswatte, Nancy Strahl, Marie Simeo, Rachel Proffitt, Kristina Kelly, Roger Crawfis, Edward Taub, David Morris and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631850 (Video Game Rehabilitation for Outpatient Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02631850 nacompletednot on this map

Video Game Rehabilitation for Outpatient Stroke (VIGoROUS): A Multi-center Comparative Effectiveness Trial of In-home Gamified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy for Rehabilitation of Chronic Upper Extremity Hemiparesis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled193ConditionsStroke, HemiparesisArmsTraditional CI Therapy, Gaming CI Therapy, Gaming CI Therapy with Additional Contact via Video Conference, Traditional Occupational Therapy/Physical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interventions for Neural Plasticity in Stroke Recovery.Archives of internal medicine research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lynne V GauthierUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell, Dept. Physical Therapy and Kinesiology.
Deborah S Nichols-LarsenThe Ohio State University, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences.
Gitendra UswatteUniversity of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Psychology.
Nancy StrahlProvidence Medford Medical Center.
Marie SimeoOhioHealth Neurological Rehabilitation.
Rachel ProffittUniversity of Missouri, Dept. of Occupational Therapy.
Kristina KellyOhio State University, Dept of Neurology.
Roger CrawfisOhio State University, Dept of Computer Science.
Edward TaubUniversity of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Psychology.
David MorrisUniversity of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Physical Therapy.
Linda Pax LowesNationwide Children's Hospital.
Victor MarkUniversity of Alabama Birmingham, Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Alexandra BorstadCollege of St. Scholastica, Dept. of Physical Therapy.

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1)UL1TR000090 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2012 to 2013
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrating behavioral intervention into motor rehabilitation is essential for improving paretic arm use in daily life. Demands on therapist time limit adoption of behavioral programs like Constraint-Induced Movement (CI) therapy, however. Self-managed motor practice could free therapist time for behavioral intervention, but there remains insufficient evidence of efficacy for a self-management approach.

methodsThis completed, parallel, five-site, pragmatic, single-blind trial established the comparative effectiveness of using in-home gaming self-management as a vehicle to redirect valuable therapist time towards behavioral intervention. Community-dwelling adults with post-stroke (>6 months) mild/moderate upper extremity hemiparesis were randomized to receive one of 4 different interventions over a 3-week period: 5 h of behaviorally-focused intervention plus gaming self-management (Self-Gaming), the same with additional behaviorally-focused telerehabilitation (Tele-Gaming), 5 h of Traditional motor-focused rehabilitation, or 35 h of CI therapy. Primary outcomes assessed everyday arm use (Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement, MAL) and motor speed/function (Wolf Motor Function Test, WMFT) immediately before treatment, immediately after treatment, and 6 months later. Intent-to-treat analyses were implemented with linear mixed-effects models on data gathered from March 15, 2016 to November 21, 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02631850.

resultsOf 193 enrolled participants, 167 began treatment and were analyzed, 150 (90%) completed treatment, and 115 (69%) completed follow-up. Tele-Gaming and Self-Gaming produced clinically meaningful MAL gains that were 1·0 points (95% CI 0·8 to 1·3) and 0·8 points (95% CI 0·5 to 1·0) larger than Traditional care, respectively. Self-Gaming was less effective than CI therapy (-0·4 points, 95% CI -0·6 to -0·2), whereas Tele-Gaming was not (-0·2 points, 95% CI -0·4 to 0·1). Six-month retention of MAL gains across all groups was 57%. All had similar clinically-meaningful WMFT gains; six-month retention of WMFT gains was 92%.

interpretationSelf-managed motor-gaming with behavioral telehealth visits has outcomes similar to in-clinic CI therapy. It addresses most access barriers, requiring just one-fifth as much therapist time that is redirected towards behavioral interventions that enhance the paretic arm's involvement in daily life.

fundingPCORI, NIH.

Identifiers

PMID34977516
PMCPMC8688168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.