Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977470›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2022

Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy.

Jason Yuen, Kai J Miller, Bryan T Klassen, Vance T Lehman, Kendall H Lee, Timothy J Kaufmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuromodulation of the central nervous system for facial pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Construction of multi-scale feature fusion segmentation model of MRI knee images based on dual attention mechanism weighted aggregation.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason YuenDepartment of Neurologic Surgery.
Kai J MillerDepartment of Neurologic Surgery.
Bryan T KlassenDepartment of Neurology.
Vance T LehmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kendall H LeeDepartment of Neurologic Surgery.
Timothy J KaufmannDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its approval in treating a number of movement disorders, magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been adopted rapidly as one of the standard treatment modalities internationally. However, the efficiency of the energy delivered by the ultrasonic waves is largely determined by the highly variable bone morphology and density characteristics of the skull. One of the widely accepted indices used to facilitate patient selection is the skull density ratio (SDR). Earlier literature suggested that an SDR of less than 0.4 would be unfavorable for MRgFUS treatment. Some prior studies have excluded patients with hyperostosis. However, there is little published data regarding the impact of other skull features such as hyperostosis on treatment success. We present the case of a 66-year-old man with medically refractory essential tremor who had an SDR of 0.38 and extensive hyperostosis frontalis interna and underwent attempted MRgFUS thalamotomy treatment. However, intraoperatively the treatment was unsuccessful in generating sufficiently elevated temperature to create a lesion of the usual desired volume, and as expected, there was minimal clinical improvement. For comparison, we also summarize a case series of 4 other patients with an SDR of less than 0.4 who had successful outcomes. We believe that SDR should not be used as the only means of selecting patients for MRgFUS. Instead, important factors such as hyperostosis should be taken into consideration for patient selection and pretreatment counseling.

Indexed as

CT, computed tomographyDBS, deep brain stimulationDTI, diffusion tensor imagingDWI, diffusion-weighted imagingET, essential tremorMRgFUS, MR imaging–guided focused ultrasoundMR, magnetic resonanceSDR, skull density ratioVIM, ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus

Identifiers

PMID34977470
PMCPMC8704442
OpenAlexW4200155204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.