ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2021
Differences in perinatal outcomes in teenage mothers with their first and third pregnancies and predictors of adverse neonatal events: A cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twin pregnancy: adolescents versus adults.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2025Article
- Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Overweight Adolescent Pregnant Mothers.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Identifying the causes and consequences of pregnancy in Iranian Kurdish women under the age of 18: A grounded theory study.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior Cesarean section in BaghdadJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2023Article
- Obstetric and neonatal complications in large for gestational age pregnancy with late gestational diabetesJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepeated teenage pregnancy is a major burden on the healthcare system worldwide.
objectiveWe aimed to compare teenagers with their first and third pregnancies and to evaluate the likelihood of neonatal complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was performed on female teenagers (aged
resultsThere was a significant risk of preeclampsia in the first pregnancy group (p = 0.01). Low birth weight, five-min Apgar score
conclusionBased on the results, teenagers with their first pregnancy had comparable obstetric outcomes (except for preeclampsia) as teenagers with their third pregnancy, whereas neonatal complications occurred more frequently in the first pregnancy group. Overall, we can predict high-risk neonates in the third pregnancy, based on the abovementioned parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.