ArticleBioactive materials2022
Printability during projection-based 3D bioprinting.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recyclable Photopolymers for Sustainable 3D Printing.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Bioink design for organ-scale projection-based 3D bioprinting.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Gravity-Tolerant In-Flight 3D Bioprinting Enabled by Stereolithography for Space Tissue Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Autonomous Hydrogel Actuators Programmed by Endogenous Biochemical Logic for Dual-Stage Morphing and Drug Release.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Engineering Organoid Platforms for Pathogenesis Research.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Nanostructured GelMA colloidal gels as bioinks for freeform multi-mode 3D printing: better replacement for the classical GelMA polymeric inks.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Modified Polysaccharides: Potential Biomaterials for Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for enhanced mechanical integrity.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Bioprinting of hepatic tissue model using photocrosslinkable dECM-containing composite hydrogel.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Enhanced Bioprinting of 3D Corneal Stroma Patches with Reliability, Assessing Product Consistency and Quality through Optimized Electron Beam Sterilization.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Article
- 3D-Printed Contact Lenses to Release Polyvinyl Alcohol as a Therapeutic Agent for the Treatment of Dry Eyes.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Printability in Multi-material Projection-Based 3-Dimensional Bioprinting.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Preparation Methods of Hydrogel Microspheres and Recent Advances in Their Application for Treating Diabetic Wounds.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- The food dye Tartrazine disrupts vascular formation both in zebrafish larvae and in human primary endothelial cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Leveraging printability and biocompatibility in materials for printing implantable vessel scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Versatile Hydrogel Based on a Controlled Microphase-Separation Strategy for Both Liquid- and Solid-Phase 3D Printing.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive soft tissue repair using shrunken scaffolds.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since projection-based 3D bioprinting (PBP) could provide high resolution, it is well suited for printing delicate structures for tissue regeneration. However, the low crosslinking density and low photo-crosslinking rate of photocurable bioink make it difficult to print fine structures. Currently, an in-depth understanding of the is lacking. Here, a research framework is established for the analysis of printability during PBP. The gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based bioink is used as an example, and the printability is systematically investigated. We analyze the photo-crosslinking reactions during the PBP process and summarize the specific requirements of bioinks for PBP. Two standard quantized models are established to evaluate 2D and 3D printing errors. Finally, the better strategies for bioprinting five typical structures, including solid organs, vascular structures, nerve conduits, thin-wall scaffolds, and micro needles, are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.