Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977427›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Demographics of ASTRO Student Members and Potential Implications for Future U.S. Radiation Oncology Workforce Diversity.

Malcolm D Mattes, Curtiland Deville, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Claire Y Fung, Gita Suneja, John W Shumway, Mudit Chowdhary, Chirag Shah, James E Bates, Pranshu Mohindra and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. In Regard to Mattes et al.Advances in radiation oncology
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Malcolm D MattesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Claire Y FungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gita SunejaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
John W ShumwayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mudit ChowdharyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Chirag ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
James E BatesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pranshu MohindraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Malika L SikerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Karen M WinkfieldMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Neha VapiwalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Trevor J RoyceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
ASTRO Committee on Health Equity, Diversity and Inclusion and ASTRO Workforce Committee

Funding

Cancer Treatment Disparities in the HIV Population: Exploring the Impact of HIV on Physician and Patient Decision-MakingK08CA228631 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SUNEJA, GITA · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA228631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe radiation oncology workforce in the United States is comparatively less diverse than the U.S. population and U.S. medical school graduates. Workforce diversity correlates with higher quality care and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether student members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) are any more diverse than resident members-in-training using the recently established medical student membership category. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Self-reported sex, race and Hispanic ethnicity, medical school, and degree(s) earned for all medical students (n = 268) and members-in-training (n = 713) were collected from the ASTRO membership database. International members were excluded. The χ

resultsCompared with members-in-training, student members were more likely to be female (40.0% vs 31.5%,

conclusionsMedical student members of ASTRO are more diverse in terms of black race, female sex, and osteopathic training, though not in terms of Hispanic ethnicity or nonmultiracial indigenous background, than the members-in-training. Longitudinal engagement with these students and assessment of the factors leading to specialty retention versus attrition may increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in radiation oncology.

Identifiers

PMID34977427
PMCPMC8688878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.