Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977422›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Assessing impacts of redeveloping public housing communities on obesity in low-income minority residents: Rationale, study design, and baseline data from the Watts Neighborhood Health Study.

Ashlesha Datar, Victoria Shier, Alexandria Braboy, Marai Jimenez-Ortiz, Angelica Hernandez, Sara Ellen King, Ying Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashlesha DatarCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Victoria ShierSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA.
Alexandria BraboyCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Marai Jimenez-OrtizCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Angelica HernandezCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Sara Ellen KingCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.
Ying LiuCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Improvements in Built- and Social-Environments and Housing on Obesity in Public Housing Residents: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in South Los AngelesR01CA228058 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ASHLESHA DATAR · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Impact of Built, Social, and Housing Environments on Obesity in Low-Income ChildrenR01HD096293 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ASHLESHA DATAR · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228058NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesogenic built- and social-environments in low-income and minority communities are often blamed for the higher rates of obesity in this population, but existing evidence is based largely on observational studies. This study leverages a natural experiment created by the redevelopment of a public housing community to examine the impact of major improvements to the housing, built, and social environments on obesity among residents. METHODS/

designThe study design is a natural experiment where residents from the redeveloped community (treatment group) will be compared to those from a similar community (control group) in terms of their pre/post changes in primary outcomes using annual longitudinal data on a cohort of residents. Quasi-experimental variation in the timing of exposure to various redevelopment components within the treated community will be further leveraged within a stepped-wedge research design to assess the impact of the redevelopment components. Primary outcome measures include body mass index, overweight, and obese status.

resultsA cohort of 868 adults and 704 children (ages 2-17 years) was recruited during 2018-2019 with up to two waves of baseline data. At baseline, the prevalence of obesity (overweight or obesity) was 57.2% (81.3%) in adults and 33.1% (52.4%) among children, with no significant differences by treatment status. No differential trends in primary outcomes were observed by treatment status during the two years of baseline. DISCUSSION: This natural experiment study offers a unique opportunity to assess whether improvements to housing, built, and social environment in low-income minority communities can lead to reductions in obesity.

Indexed as

Body mass index (BMI)Built environmentNatural experimentObesitySocial environment

Identifiers

PMID34977422
PMCPMC8685992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.