Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977353›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

DPWSS: differentially private working set selection for training support vector machines.

Zhenlong Sun, Jing Yang, Xiaoye Li, Jianpei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhenlong SunCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jing YangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiaoye LiCollege of Computer and Control Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, China.
Jianpei ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Support vector machine (SVM) is a robust machine learning method and is widely used in classification. However, the traditional SVM training methods may reveal personal privacy when the training data contains sensitive information. In the training process of SVMs, working set selection is a vital step for the sequential minimal optimization-type decomposition methods. To avoid complex sensitivity analysis and the influence of high-dimensional data on the noise of the existing SVM classifiers with privacy protection, we propose a new differentially private working set selection algorithm (DPWSS) in this paper, which utilizes the exponential mechanism to privately select working sets. We theoretically prove that the proposed algorithm satisfies differential privacy. The extended experiments show that the DPWSS algorithm achieves classification capability almost the same as the original non-privacy SVM under different parameters. The errors of optimized objective value between the two algorithms are nearly less than two, meanwhile, the DPWSS algorithm has a higher execution efficiency than the original non-privacy SVM by comparing iterations on different datasets. To the best of our knowledge, DPWSS is the first private working set selection algorithm based on differential privacy.

Indexed as

Differential privacyExponential mechanismSequential minimal optimizationSupport vector machinesWorking set selection

Identifiers

PMID34977353
PMCPMC8670395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.