ArticleBone reports2022
Adherence to bone health guidelines in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: Status and clinical impact in a Swiss cohort experience.
Article in Bone reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Timeliness and Compliance of Osteoporosis Care in Oncology: Evidence from a Dedicated Bone Health Service.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimIn patients with postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ER + eBC), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used for effective relapse prevention. However, AIs reduce bone density and increase bone-related events (BREs). Alongside calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation, bisphosphonates and denosumab are well-known options for improving outcomes in bone health and breast cancer prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the practice patterns of bone health guideline-based management in real-world patients with ER + eBC. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn total, 68 patients with ER + eBC treated between 2009 and 2014 at the University Hospital Basel were included in this retrospective cohort study. Chart reviews were analyzed. Baseline, clinicopathological, treatment, and BRE data were extracted. Each patient was specifically reviewed for therapy adherence to the Swiss bone health guidelines (Swiss Association against Osteoporosis 2010 [SVGO]).
resultsThe mean patient age was 66.5 (range, 56-74) years, all post-menopausal. The most frequent tumor characteristics were tumor size of pT1-pT2 (N = 53, 77.9%) and treatment with letrozole (N = 35, 51.5%), followed by tamoxifen as a switch strategy (N = 27, 40.3%). The median treatment time with AIs was 47 (range, 30-60) months. Five patients (7.8%) experienced a fracture during or after AI treatment. Moreover, 51 (75%) patients were treated according to the SVGO recommendations.
conclusionThe fracture rate in our retrospective cohort was comparable to that in the larger phase III randomized trials. The adherence to bone health guidelines was satisfactory but still suboptimal. Clinicians should strictly adhere to the current bone health guidelines to ensure the best possible prevention of BREs and maintain bone health and cancer prognosis in patients with ER + eBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.