Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977143›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2021

Surgical Treatment of Radial Nerve Injuries Associated With Humeral Shaft Fracture-A Single Center Experience.

Lukas Rasulić, Slavko Djurašković, Novak Lakićević, Milan Lepić, Andrija Savić, Jovan Grujić, Aleksa Mićić, Stefan Radojević, Vladimir Puzović, Miloš Maletić and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Mechanism of Injury Affects the Incidence and Time to Recovery of Nerve Injuries Associated With Humeral Shaft Fractures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukas RasulićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Slavko DjuraškovićClinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Novak LakićevićClinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Milan LepićClinic for Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Andrija SavićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovan GrujićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksa MićićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stefan RadojevićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir PuzovićCollege of Higher Vocational Studies "Sports Academy", Belgrade, Serbia.
Miloš MaletićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stefan Mandić-RajčevićSchool of Public Health and Health Management and Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Montenegro · MEInstitute of Public Health of Serbia · RSMilitary Medical Academy · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radial nerve injuries are often associated with humeral shaft fractures. The results of treatment of these injuries, by contemporary surgical approaches, remain diverse. In this paper we presented the outcomes and analyzed the patient, clinical, and surgical procedure related characteristics and factors that may influence the outcome overall, in 77 patients treated at Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia during a 20 years period. The nerve injuries were verified by US and EMNG. The majority of patients were treated by neurolysis or sural nerve grafting, while only few were treated by direct suture. The final recovery was evaluated by muscle strength assessment and classified using MRC. We analyzed extension of the wrist, extension of the fingers including the thumb, and abduction of the thumb. There was a significant statistical difference in MRC grade following the treatment. The total rate of useful functional recovery was achieved in 69 (89.61%) out of all studied patients, out of whom 20 (28.99%) achieved excellent recovery, 26 (37.68%) achieved good recovery and 23 (33.33%) achieved fair recovery. Only 8 (10.39%) out of all studied patients achieved poor recovery. The injured nerves, that were preserved in continuity, acquired by a low-energy trauma, and treated earlier than the 6 months were associated with better functional outcome following the surgery. In addition, there was a trend of better functional improvement with aging, keeping in mind that the old were subjected to lower energy trauma. The expectant management followed by surgery of radial nerve injury associated with humeral shaft fracture should be around 3 months, and the surgical nerve repair should not be performed later than the 6 months after injury. The energy of trauma may be a factor predicting patient's final recovery following the treatment.

Indexed as

graftinghumeral shaft fractureneurolysisoutcomeradial nerve injuriessurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID34977143
PMCPMC8716365
OpenAlexW4200028941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.