Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977053›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2021

Artificial Intelligence in Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis.

Fujiao He, Yaqin Wang, Yun Xiu, Yixin Zhang, Lizhu Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06952439 (Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Performance of the Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06952439 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Performance of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) Technologies Utilized by the Origin Medical EXAM ASSISTANT

TypeobservationalSponsorOrigin Medical Systems, Inc.Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled551ConditionsTo Validate the Clinical Performance of AI/ML Technologies in First-trimester Pregnant Participants, First Trimester PregnancyArmsImages and cines captured through the capture card (ICC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fujiao HeDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yaqin WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yun XiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yixin ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lizhu ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to medical imaging has resulted in great breakthroughs. Given the unique position of ultrasound (US) in prenatal screening, the research on AI in prenatal US has practical significance with its application to prenatal US diagnosis improving work efficiency, providing quantitative assessments, standardizing measurements, improving diagnostic accuracy, and automating image quality control. This review provides an overview of recent studies that have applied AI technology to prenatal US diagnosis and explains the challenges encountered in these applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefetusmedical imagingprenatal diagnosisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34977053
PMCPMC8716504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.