Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977040›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Gene-Based Testing of Interactions Using XGBoost in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Yingjie Guo, Chenxi Wu, Zhian Yuan, Yansu Wang, Zhen Liang, Yang Wang, Yi Zhang, Lei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingjie GuoInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Chenxi WuDepartment of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Zhian YuanResearch Institute of Big Data Science and Industry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Yansu WangInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Zhen LiangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Yang WangSchool of Electronic and Communication Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.
Yi ZhangBeidahuang Industry Group General Hospital, Harbin, China.
Lei XuSchool of Electronic and Communication Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the myriad of statistical methods that identify gene-gene interactions in the realm of qualitative genome-wide association studies, gene-based interactions are not only powerful statistically, but also they are interpretable biologically. However, they have limited statistical detection by making assumptions on the association between traits and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Thus, a gene-based method (GGInt-XGBoost) originated from XGBoost is proposed in this article. Assuming that log odds ratio of disease traits satisfies the additive relationship if the pair of genes had no interactions, the difference in error between the XGBoost model with and without additive constraint could indicate gene-gene interaction; we then used a permutation-based statistical test to assess this difference and to provide a statistical

Indexed as

additive modelgene-based testinggene–gene interactionsgenome-wide association studiesXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID34977040
PMCPMC8716787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.