Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Pooling for SARS-CoV2 Surveillance: Validation and Strategy for Implementation in K-12 Schools.

Alexandra M Simas, Jimmy W Crott, Chris Sedore, Augusta Rohrbach, Anthony P Monaco, Stacey B Gabriel, Niall Lennon, Brendan Blumenstiel, Caroline A Genco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2, options for efficiency at scale.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  6. Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra M SimasDepartment of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jimmy W CrottOffice of the Vice Provost of Research, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Chris SedoreTufts Technology Services, Somerville, MA, United States.
Augusta RohrbachOffice of the Vice Provost of Research, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Anthony P MonacoTufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Stacey B GabrielBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Niall LennonBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Brendan BlumenstielBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Caroline A GencoDepartment of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Tufts University · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated testing of a population is critical for limiting the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and for the safe reopening of educational institutions such as kindergarten-grade 12 (K-12) schools and colleges. Many screening efforts utilize the CDC RT-PCR based assay which targets two regions of the novel Coronavirus nucleocapsid gene. The standard approach of testing each person individually, however, poses a financial burden to these institutions and is therefore a barrier to using testing for re-opening. Pooling samples from multiple individuals into a single test is an attractive alternate approach that promises significant cost savings-however the specificity and sensitivity of such approaches needs to be assessed prior to deployment. To this end, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of analyzing samples in pools of eight by the established RT-PCR assay. Participants (1,576) were recruited from amongst the Tufts University community undergoing regular screening. Each volunteer provided two swabs, one analyzed separately and the other in a pool of eight. Because the positivity rate was very low, we spiked approximately half of the pools with laboratory-generated swabs produced from known positive cases outside the Tufts testing program. The results of pooled tests had 100% correspondence with those of their respective individual tests. We conclude that pooling eight samples does not negatively impact the specificity or sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay and suggest that this approach can be utilized by institutions seeking to reduce surveillance costs.

Indexed as

COVID-19RNA, ViralHumansPilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2SchoolsSpecimen HandlingRNA, ViralCOVID-19pooled testing methodologyRT-PCR assaySARS-CoV-2screening

Identifiers

PMID34976934
PMCPMC8718607
OpenAlexW4225839812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.