Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976881›Full record

ArticleIndian dermatology online journal2021

Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Preparation and Use in Dermatology.

Shuken Dashore, Kavish Chouhan, Soni Nanda, Aseem Sharma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian dermatology online journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06281483 (Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Platelet-rich Fibrin Versus Conventional Treatment in Chronic Non-healing Skin Ulcers), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06281483 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Platelet-rich Fibrin Versus Conventional Treatment in Chronic Non-healing Skin Ulcers: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKafrelsheikh UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsChronic Non-healing Skin UlcersArmsplatelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, Surgical debridement, normal saline washing and dressing coverage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuken DashoreDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Dashore's DHL Centre, Vijay Nagar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kavish ChouhanDepartment of Dermatology, DERMACLINIX, Defence Colony, New Delhi, India.
Soni NandaDepartment of Dermatology, Shine and Smile Clinic, Mayur Vihar, Delhi, India.
Aseem SharmaDermatology Department, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of these recommendations is to provide a framework to practitioners for implementing useful, evidence-based recommendations for the preparation of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and its use in various dermatological indications. The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) assigned the task of preparing these recommendations to its taskforce on platelet-rich plasma. A comprehensive literature search was done in the English language on the PRF across multiple databases. The grade of evidence and strength of recommendation was evaluated on the GRADE framework (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). A draft of clinical recommendations was developed on the best available evidence which was also scrutinized and critically evaluated by the IADVL Academy of Dermatology. Based on the inputs received, this final consensus statement was prepared. A total of 40 articles (meta-analyses, prospective and retrospective studies, reviews [including chapters in books] and case series) were critically evaluated and the evidence thus gathered was used in the preparation of these recommendations. This expert group recommends use of A-PRF+ protocol, that is (200 g for 8 min) for preparation of solid PRF and C-PRF protocol (700 g for 8 min) for liquid PRF. Swing out bucket model of centrifuge or the horizontal centrifuge is recommended for preparation of both PRF, and liquid PRF. Centrifugation must begin within 90-120 s of drawing of blood. PRF can be used in various indications for skin rejuvenation and nonhealing ulcers as either monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.

Indexed as

A-PRFcentrifugeC-PRFI-PRFplatelet-rich fibrin guidelinesplatelet-rich plasmapreparationRCFrecommendationsregenerative medicineRPMstandardization

Identifiers

PMID34976881
PMCPMC8664174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.