ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021
Evidence summary of human milk fortifier in preterm infants.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- EGF and IgA in maternal milk, donor milk, and milk fortifiers in the neonatal intensive care unit setting.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multi-Omics Profiles of Small Intestine Organoids in Reaction to Breast Milk and Different Infant Formula Preparations.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Impact of breastfeeding and other early-life factors on the development of the oral microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Human Breast Milk: The Key Role in the Maturation of Immune, Gastrointestinal and Central Nervous Systems: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo search for and collect evidence on human milk fortifier in preterm infants, and to summarize the latest and best evidence, so as to provide reference for clinical work.
methodsWe searched the databases of UpToDate, American Guide Network, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), PubMed, ResearchGate, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, Chinese Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and Yi Maitong, and collected relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The retrieval time limit was from the database establishment to July 2021. The quality of the literature was independently evaluated by 2 researchers, who then extracted and summarized the evidence from qualifying articles.
resultsA total of 16 articles were selected, including 3 guidelines, 3 systematic reviews, 5 expert consensuses, 3 RCTs, and 1 best practice guideline, including indications, time for usage, methods, monitoring and management, time of cessation, health education, and post-discharge feeding.
conclusionsThis study summarized the best evidence for human milk fortifier in preterm infants. Medical staff should assess the specific clinical conditions and parental wishes when applying the best evidence to ensure the effectiveness and safety of human milk fortifier, thus improving the quality of clinical nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.