ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021
A comparative study between traditional head measurement and structured light three-dimensional scanning when measuring infant head shape.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- SoftSpot3D: prospective study of mobile 3D reconstruction for infants' cranial conditions.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Current understanding of children's head shape and its impact on health: a cross-sectional study among pediatric medical staff in China.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Cranial Shape Measurements Obtained Using a Caliper and Elastic Bands Are Useful for Brachycephaly and Deformational Plagiocephaly Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- A Three-Dimensional Structured Light Vision System by Using a Combination of Single-Line and Three-Line Lasers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the correlation and consistency between traditional head measurement and structured light three-dimensional (3D) scanning parameters when measuring infant skull shape.
methodsA total of 76 infants aged 3 months to 2.5 years old were included in the study. Head circumference (HC) was measured with a tape measure. The transverse, anteroposterior, and oblique diameters were measured using a spreading caliper, and the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) and a cranial index (CI) of symmetry were calculated; 76 cases were measured successfully. The above indexes were measured using a structured light 3D scanning system (71 cases were measured with success). Thus, in the end, the valid data of 71 cases were analyzed, and the measurements of the two approaches were compared.
resultsThe 95% confidence interval of traditional head measurement and structured light 3D scanning was between 0.633 and 0.988. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a high correlation between the two methods (r=0.793-0.980). The correlation coefficients of the transverse diameter, anteroposterior diameter, and HC, and the CI of symmetry were higher than 0.9. The lowest correlation coefficient for the CVAI was 0.793. The P values of the above measurement data were all <0.001, which indicated that they were closely related. A Bland-Altman plot indicated reasonable consistency between the two methods.
conclusionsBoth traditional head measurement and structured light 3D scanning are suitable for the measurement of infant head shape. However, while traditional head measurement using a spreading caliper is economical and simple, making it suitable for general screening at a basic level, structured light 3D scanning can deliver additional parameters, which is useful for infants with an abnormal head shape. The latter is also convenient for designing a customized helmet for skull correction when needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.