ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021
New risk score model for identifying individuals at risk for diabetes in southwest China.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertriglyceridemia is a dose-dependent risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for incident type 2 diabetes in Chinese people with intermediate hyperglycemia: a systematic literature review and external validation study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Pooled it
- Establishment of dynamic nomogram and risk score models for T2DM: a retrospective cohort study in Beijing.BMC public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of diabetes is increasing rapidly and becoming a major public health issue worldwide. We aimed to develop a novel nomogram model for long-term diabetic risk prediction in a Chinese population. A prospective cohort study was performed on 687 nondiabetic individuals who underwent routine physical examination in 1992 and 2007. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model to optimize feature selection. Multiple Cox regression analysis was performed, and a simple nomogram was constructed. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plot were conducted to assess the predictive accuracy of the model. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation. Of the 687 participants without diabetes at baseline, 74 developed diabetes during the follow-up time. This simple nomogram model was constructed by family history of diabetes, height, waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose and white blood cell count. The AUCs were 0.812 (95% CI: 0.729-0.895) and 0.794 (95% CI: 0.734-0.854) for 10-year and 15-year diabetic risk. The bootstrap corrected c-index was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.721-0.821). The calibration plot also achieved good agreement between observational and actual diabetic incidence. The stratification into different risk groups by optimal cut-off value of 12.8 allowed significant distinction between cumulative diabetic incidence curves in the whole cohort and several subgroups. We established and internally validated a novel nomogram which can provide individual diabetic risk prediction for Chinese population and this practical screening model may help clinicians to identify individuals at high risk of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.