Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976657›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Smoking cessation intentions and attempts one year after the federally mandated smoke-free housing rule.

Kimberly Horn, Craig T Dearfield, Sallie Beth Johnson, Kevin Krost, Sofia Rincon Gallardo Patino, Tiffany Gray, Ian Crandell, Debra H Bernat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly HornVirginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Craig T DearfieldThe George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, USA.
Sallie Beth JohnsonRadford University Carilion, Department of Public Health and Healthcare Leadership, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Kevin KrostVirginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Sofia Rincon Gallardo PatinoVirginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tiffany GrayVirginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Ian CrandellVirginia Tech-Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Debra H BernatThe George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, USA.
Biomedical Research Institute · USMilken Institute · USRadford University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Effect of the Housing and Urban Development’s Smokefree Public Housing Rule on Air Quality and Health in the District of ColumbiaR01CA226074 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BERNAT, DEBRA H, HORN, KIMBERLY A · 2019 to 2021
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examines public housing residents' smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts one year after implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. The sample includes 233 cigarette smokers, ages 18-80, who reside in the District of Columbia Housing Authority. Data collection occurred between March and August 2019. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and Wilcoxon two-sample test analyses assessed smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts across resident demographics and characteristics. Findings showed 17.2% of residents reported not thinking about quitting, 39.1% reported thinking about quitting, and 48.6% reported thinking about quitting specifically because of the rule. Residents ages 60-80 were more likely to consider quitting because of the rule, compared to residents ages 18-59. Of those thinking of quitting, 58.6% were sure they could quit if they tried. Those thinking of quitting due to the rule (62.0%) were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt in the past 3 months than those i not attributinging thinking of quitting to the rule. Res Residents trying to quit reported an average of 2.7 attempts in the last 3 months;; most perceived evidence-based cessation supports as not helpful. A A majority reported thinking about quitting and attempting to quit but continuing to smoke, indicating a significant gap between intent to quit and successfully quitting. Results suggest that the rule positively influenced smoking behaviors. However, additional interventions are needed to assist public housing residents with successfully quitting smoking.

Indexed as

Policy evaluationPublic healthPublic housingSmoking cessationTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID34976657
PMCPMC8683937
OpenAlexW3205394573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.