Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976654›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Beyond words: Parental perceptions on human papilloma virus vaccination recommendations and its impact on uptake.

Teresa K L Boitano, Casey Daniel, Young-Il Kim, J Michael Straughn, Sylvia Peral, Isabel Scarinci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa K L BoitanoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Casey DanielMitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Young-Il KimDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Michael StraughnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sylvia PeralDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Isabel ScarinciDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal was to evaluate how provider recommendations regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination impact uptake in a rural setting. The study used a cross-sectional, population-based design with cluster sampling to survey parents/guardians of children ages 9 to 18 in 2019 in Alabama. In addition to demographics/knowledge questions, participants were asked about type of healthcare provider recommendation and impressions they had from this interaction. The primary outcome variable was the result of the healthcare provider recommendation with options including: child got vaccinated day of recommendation, HPV vaccination was scheduled, or HPV vaccination was not scheduled. Bivariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression were performed. Of the 358 respondents, approximately 40% indicated receiving a recommendation from a provider to vaccinate their child. Age of the parent, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and health insurance coverage were similar across groups. Female parents were more likely to report receiving HPV vaccination recommendation than males (44.1% vs. 23.3%; p = 0.009). The type of provider recommendation was not significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake. The impression from the recommendation of HPV vaccination being "important" was significantly associated with the child being vaccinated that day (OR = 7.31, 95% CI = 2.20-24.3) as well as scheduling HPV vaccination (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.01-9.92). Parents who got the impression that "there was no hurry" were less likely to vaccinate their child that day (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09-0.59). Provider recommedation is well-established as a significant predictor of HPV vaccination, these findings indicate that how the recommendation is perceived may play a more important role in HPV vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

Cervical cancer preventionHPVPatient educationProvider recommendationsVaccinationVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID34976654
PMCPMC8683875
OpenAlexW3206144504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.