ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021
Early solicited adverse events following the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination, a population survey from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and Factors Associated with Self-Reported Skin Symptoms of Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) of COVISHIELD vaccination among healthcare workers in Ghana.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine on Women's Reproductive Health: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Does ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 heterologous prime-boost vaccination trigger higher rates of vaccine-related adverse events?IJID regions · 2023Article
- Sex-disaggregated outcomes of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination: A Dutch cohort study and review of the literature.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Pattern of self-reported adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi Arabia: A nationwide study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccination among the Saudi Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Adverse events following administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Incidence and Characteristics of Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination in a Population-Based Programme.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Adverse reactions to the first and second doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Acute unsolicited adverse events following BNT162b2 vaccine in Saudi Arabia, a real-world data.Vaccine · 2022Article
- Parents' Hesitancy to Vaccinate Their Children Against COVID-19, a Country-Wide Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine in health care professionals: A descriptive observational study conducted in a Portuguese hospital.Porto biomedical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post rollout safety for the coronavirus disease vaccines is crucial and recommended. To explore the early solicited adverse events (AE) following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in Saudi Arabia, we distributed an online survey to adults vaccinated with BNT162b2 over the first week of June 2021, to collect data on first (V1), second doses (V2), symptoms, severity, and outcome after an informed consent was obtained. We recruited 3639 BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals, of which one-third had received two doses, 63.3% were female, 77% were healthy, and 89% had 18-55 years of age, while only 9.8% had a history of allergy. Overall, 50.3% had any AEs after any dose, especially those younger than 55 years of age, female, history of comorbidity, and when adjusted for age and gender, lung or cardiovascular diseases. Overall, the most common AE were pain at the injection site (44%), tiredness (39%), or body ache (31%). Compared to V1, a higher rate of post-V2 systemic AE (36% vs. 51%). Most AEs started very early (within 3 days), and rarely delayed in recovery (>2 weeks). Anti-pyretic was the most commonly used (51.7%), a third of which was unnecessary. Only 1.7% required hospital admission. By multivariate analysis, predictors for admission were the presence of lung or immunocompromising diseases. In conclusion, common AEs after BNT162b2 in the real world were generally mild, self-limiting, higher after the second dose, and largely mimicking that reported in clinical trials. The causality of these AE and the persistence of post-vaccination symptoms needs to be investigated further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.