Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976653›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Early solicited adverse events following the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination, a population survey from Saudi Arabia.

Abdulellah M Almohaya, Farah Qari, Ghuzlan A Zubaidi, Noura Alnajim, Khadeeja Moustafa, Malak M Alshabi, Faleh M Alsubaie, Ibrahim Almutairi, Qusai Alwazna, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Adverse reactions to the first and second doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulellah M AlmohayaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Ad-Diriyah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Farah QariCollege of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghuzlan A ZubaidiCollege of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noura AlnajimCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khadeeja MoustafaCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Malak M AlshabiCollege of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faleh M AlsubaieCollege of Medicine, Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlmutairiAd-Diriyah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Qusai AlwaznaAd-Diriyah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jaffar A Al-TawfiqSpecialty Internal Medicine and Quality Department, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Mazin BarryDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Alfaisal University · SAMinistry of Health · SAAlmaarefa UniversityImam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USKing Saud University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post rollout safety for the coronavirus disease vaccines is crucial and recommended. To explore the early solicited adverse events (AE) following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in Saudi Arabia, we distributed an online survey to adults vaccinated with BNT162b2 over the first week of June 2021, to collect data on first (V1), second doses (V2), symptoms, severity, and outcome after an informed consent was obtained. We recruited 3639 BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals, of which one-third had received two doses, 63.3% were female, 77% were healthy, and 89% had 18-55 years of age, while only 9.8% had a history of allergy. Overall, 50.3% had any AEs after any dose, especially those younger than 55 years of age, female, history of comorbidity, and when adjusted for age and gender, lung or cardiovascular diseases. Overall, the most common AE were pain at the injection site (44%), tiredness (39%), or body ache (31%). Compared to V1, a higher rate of post-V2 systemic AE (36% vs. 51%). Most AEs started very early (within 3 days), and rarely delayed in recovery (>2 weeks). Anti-pyretic was the most commonly used (51.7%), a third of which was unnecessary. Only 1.7% required hospital admission. By multivariate analysis, predictors for admission were the presence of lung or immunocompromising diseases. In conclusion, common AEs after BNT162b2 in the real world were generally mild, self-limiting, higher after the second dose, and largely mimicking that reported in clinical trials. The causality of these AE and the persistence of post-vaccination symptoms needs to be investigated further.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsCoronavirusCovid-19NovelSafetyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34976653
PMCPMC8683974
OpenAlexW3206910518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.