Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976639›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Experimental study of front-of-package nutrition labels' efficacy on perceived healthfulness of sugar-sweetened beverages among youth in six countries.

Karen Hock, Rachel B Acton, Alejandra Jáuregui, Lana Vanderlee, Christine M White, David Hammond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Sociodemographic differences in nutrition labels effect on Chilean and Mexican youth.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen HockSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Rachel B ActonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Alejandra JáureguiCentre for Health and Nutrition Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, MOR 62100, Mexico.
Lana VanderleeSchool of Nutrition, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Christine M WhiteSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CAInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels have been proposed as a strategy to help limit sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among youth. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of FOP labels in youth across different countries. A between-group experiment was conducted to examine the impact of FOP labels (no-label control, Health Star Rating, 'High in' Octagon, Guideline Daily Amount (GDA), Traffic Light, or Nutri-Score) on perceived healthfulness of an SSB. The study was conducted online in November-December 2019 with 10,762 children aged 10-17 from six countries: Australia, Canada, Chile, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A binary logistic regression model tested the impacts of FOP label condition, country, and sociodemographic characteristics on participants' likelihood of perceiving the SSB to be Unhealthy. Compared to the control condition, participants in each of the five FOP label conditions were significantly more likely to perceive the SSB as Unhealthy (p < 0.002). The 'High in' Octagon label had the greatest impact on perceived healthfulness across five out of six countries, whereas the GDA and Nutri-Score labels demonstrated the lowest impact across all six countries. The impact of FOP labels was consistent across sex, age, race/ethnicity, and perceived income adequacy. FOP labels can significantly reduce the perceived healthfulness of SSBs among youth across multiple countries. The current study adds to the evidence that 'high in' labels, which use intuitive symbols such as the octagon 'stop sign', are the most efficacious labels for helping consumers identify foods high in nutrients of concern, including SSBs.

Indexed as

Adolescent healthFood policyFOP, Front-of-packageFront-of-package nutrition labelsGDA, Guideline Daily AmountHSR, Health Star RatingIFPS, International Food Policy StudyNFT, Nutrition facts tableSSB, Sugar-sweetened beverageSugar-sweetened beveragesUK, United KingdomUS, United StatesWHO, World Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID34976639
PMCPMC8683942
OpenAlexW3204123321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.