ArticleCureus2021
Hereditary Angioedema: A Gynecology and Obstetrics Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 2025 WAO Guidelines for the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of hereditary angioedema, with consideration of worldwide disparities.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant genetic disease that causes tissue edema mediated by bradykinin. The angioedema attacks have several triggers including stress, trauma, infection, and increased estrogens levels. This explains the greater incidence and clinical severity in women, which are usually asymptomatic until puberty, when the attacks begin to occur. It may involve multiple locations on the body, leading to complications, such as surgical intervention prompt by severe acute abdominal pain, and laryngeal edema that can culminate in death from asphyxia. This is of particular concern as this angioedema does not respond to life-saving medications commonly used in its treatment, namely, high doses of second-generation antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine. Hereditary angioedema attacks are treated with specific medication that includes icatibant, ecallantide, and C1 inhibitor, the latter being also used in short-term and long-term prophylaxis. There are other pharmacological strategies for long-term prophylaxis like lanadelumab, danazol, stanozolol, aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid. During pregnancy and lactation, the preferred treatment and prophylaxis is C1 inhibitor. We report a case of hereditary angioedema describing its chronological evolution over a period of a woman's life, and highlighting some of the specificities of this pathology that intersect with the specialty of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Our aim is to draw attention to these particularities, namely the triggering factors of crisis, the need for high suspicion of the diagnosis, and the treatment and prophylaxis options for pregnant and non-pregnant women that can make the difference between life and death. To achieve a favorable outcome, the multidisciplinary teamwork between the specialties of Immunoallergology and Obstetrics and Gynecology was crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.