ArticleChemical science2021
Accelerated AI development for autonomous materials synthesis in flow.
Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reinforcement Learning for Cathode Material Design Through Sequential Decision-Making Frameworks.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond Optimization: Exploring Novelty Discovery in Autonomous Experiments.ACS nanoscience Au · 2026Article
- Surfactant-Free Continuous-Flow Synthesis of CuSmall methods · 2026Article
- Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- AI-Driven TENGs for Self-Powered Smart Sensors and Intelligent Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Science acceleration and accessibility with self-driving labs.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Photo-Induced Bandgap Engineering of Metal Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots In Flow.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Democratizing Microreactor Technology for Accelerated Discoveries in Chemistry and Materials Research.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Explainability and human intervention in autonomous scanning probe microscopy.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Using Data-Driven Learning to Predict and Control the Outcomes of Inorganic Materials Synthesis.Inorganic chemistry · 2023Article
- A Brief Introduction to Chemical Reaction Optimization.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- AlphaFlow: autonomous discovery and optimization of multi-step chemistry using a self-driven fluidic lab guided by reinforcement learning.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Big Data in a Nano World: A Review on Computational, Data-Driven Design of Nanomaterials Structures, Properties, and Synthesis.ACS nano · 2022Review
- Autonomous Multi-Step and Multi-Objective Optimization Facilitated by Real-Time Process Analytics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Machine-Learning-Guided Discovery ofJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomous robotic experimentation strategies are rapidly rising in use because, without the need for user intervention, they can efficiently and precisely converge onto optimal intrinsic and extrinsic synthesis conditions for a wide range of emerging materials. However, as the material syntheses become more complex, the meta-decisions of artificial intelligence (AI)-guided decision-making algorithms used in autonomous platforms become more important. In this work, a surrogate model is developed using data from over 1000 in-house conducted syntheses of metal halide perovskite quantum dots in a self-driven modular microfluidic material synthesizer. The model is designed to represent the global failure rate, unfeasible regions of the synthesis space, synthesis ground truth, and sampling noise of a real robotic material synthesis system with multiple output parameters (peak emission, emission linewidth, and quantum yield). With this model, over 150 AI-guided decision-making strategies within a single-period horizon reinforcement learning framework are automatically explored across more than 600 000 simulated experiments - the equivalent of 7.5 years of continuous robotic operation and 400 L of reagents - to identify the most effective methods for accelerated materials development with multiple objectives. Specifically, the structure and meta-decisions of an ensemble neural network-based material development strategy are investigated, which offers a favorable technique for intelligently and efficiently navigating a complex material synthesis space with multiple targets. The developed ensemble neural network-based decision-making algorithm enables more efficient material formulation optimization in a no prior information environment than well-established algorithms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.