ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage and Conservative Treatment on Prognosis of Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Rebleeding: The Sword of Damocles in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Improved Precision and Safety of Supra-Tentorial Intracranial Hematoma Puncture Using C-Arm CT Four-Dimensional Navigation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Retracted: Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage and Conservative Treatment on Prognosis of Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/79EB5C745704D29FBF568A2B4E7B09
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the effect of minimally invasive puncture drainage under unsupervised learning algorithm and conservative treatment on the prognosis of patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Fifty patients with cerebral hemorrhage were selected as the research objects. The CT images of patients were segmented by unsupervised learning algorithm, and the application value of unsupervised learning algorithm on CT images of patients with cerebral hemorrhage was evaluated. According to the treatment wishes of the patients themselves and their authorizers, they were divided into 30 patients with cerebral hemorrhage in the minimally invasive group and 20 patients with cerebral hemorrhage in the conservative group. The incidence rate of complications of cerebral hemorrhage, the length of hospitalization of the two groups, hematoma volume at admission, 3 days and 7 days after operation, and the hematoma dissipation rate on the 3rd and 7th day after operation were used as the evaluation index of therapeutic effect. MRS and ADL scores were used as prognostic indicators. The results show that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.