Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34976110›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Deep-Learning-Based Survival Prediction of Patients in Coronary Care Units.

Rui Yang, Tao Huang, Zichen Wang, Wei Huang, Aozi Feng, Li Li, Jun Lyu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiview Deep Forest for Overall Survival Prediction in Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui YangClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-7338
Tao HuangDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-4290
Zichen WangDepartment of Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-6611
Wei HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery II, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, Guangdong 514031, China.
Aozi FengDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Li LiDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Jun LyuClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-8771
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNMeizhou City People's Hospital · CNUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA survival prediction model based on deep learning has higher accuracy than the CPH model in predicting the survival of CCU patients, and it also has a better discrimination ability. We collected information on patients with various diseases in coronary care units (CCUs) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The purpose of this study was to use this information to construct a neural-network model based on deep learning to predict the survival probabilities of patients with conditions that are common in CCUs.

methodWe collected information on patients in the United States with five common diseases in CCUs from 2001 to 2012. We randomly divided the patients into a training cohort and a testing cohort at a ratio of 7 : 3 and applied a survival prediction method based on deep learning to predict their survival probability. We compared our model with the Cox proportional-hazards regression (CPH) model and used the concordance indexes (C-indexes), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration plots to evaluate the predictive performance of the model.

resultsThe 3,388 CCU patients included in the study were randomly divided into 2,371 in the training cohort and 1,017 in the testing cohort. The stepwise regression results showed that the important factors affecting patient survival were the type of disease, age, race, anion gap, glucose, neutrophils, white blood cells, potassium, creatine kinase, and blood urea nitrogen (

conclusionA survival prediction model based on deep learning has higher accuracy than the CPH model in predicting the survival of CCU patients, and it also has a better discrimination ability.

Indexed as

Coronary Care UnitsDeep LearningSurvival AnalysisAgedCardiovascular DiseasesComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID34976110
PMCPMC8720014
OpenAlexW4200545055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.