Trial reportComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021
Comparison of the Early Results of Lateral Direct Anterior Approach (L-DAA) and Traditional Posterolateral Approach (PLA) in Hip Arthroplasty.
Trial report in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Early Complications Between a Direct Anterior Approach or Posterolateral Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Article
- Retracted: Comparison of the Early Results of Lateral Direct Anterior Approach (L-DAA) and Traditional Posterolateral Approach (PLA) in Hip Arthroplasty.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the early results of lateral direct anterior approach (L-DAA) and traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) in hip arthroplasty.
methodsA total of 24 patients who underwent hip replacement from 2018 to 2021 were divided into PLA group (
resultsThe length of incision was shorter; the amount of bleeding was less in the L-DAA group than that in the PLA group. The visual analogue scale (Vas) pain scores for the L-DAA group were significantly lower than that for the PLA group at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 month after operation, and Harris hip scores in the L-DAA group were significantly high in the PLA group at 1 month after operation. In addition, there are no statistically significant differences in acetabular anteversion, abduction, and angle between the two groups.
conclusionL-DAA was superior to PLA for early recovery after hip arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.