Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34975782›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Silver Nanoparticles Functionalized With Antimicrobial Polypeptides: Benefits and Possible Pitfalls of a Novel Anti-infective Tool.

Maria S Zharkova, Olga Yu Golubeva, Dmitriy S Orlov, Elizaveta V Vladimirova, Alexander V Dmitriev, Alessandro Tossi, Olga V Shamova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nanosystems for delivery of indolicidin peptide.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sustainable, scalable nanotechnology approach using filtrate fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria S ZharkovaWorld-Class Research Center "Center for Personalized Medicine", FSBSI Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Olga Yu GolubevaLaboratory of the Nanostructures Research, Institute of Silicate Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitriy S OrlovWorld-Class Research Center "Center for Personalized Medicine", FSBSI Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elizaveta V VladimirovaWorld-Class Research Center "Center for Personalized Medicine", FSBSI Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander V DmitrievWorld-Class Research Center "Center for Personalized Medicine", FSBSI Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alessandro TossiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Olga V ShamovaWorld-Class Research Center "Center for Personalized Medicine", FSBSI Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Institute of Experimental Medicine · RUInstitute of Chemistry of Silicates named after I.V. Grebenshchikov · RUUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and antimicrobial peptides or proteins (AMPs/APs) are both considered as promising platforms for the development of novel therapeutic agents effective against the growing number of drug-resistant pathogens. The observed synergy of their antibacterial activity suggested the prospect of introducing antimicrobial peptides or small antimicrobial proteins into the gelatinized coating of AgNPs. Conjugates with protegrin-1, indolicidin, protamine, histones, and lysozyme were comparatively tested for their antibacterial properties and compared with unconjugated nanoparticles and antimicrobial polypeptides alone. Their toxic effects were similarly tested against both normal eukaryotic cells (human erythrocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, neutrophils, and dermal fibroblasts) and tumor cells (human erythromyeloid leukemia K562 and human histiocytic lymphoma U937 cell lines). The AMPs/APs retained their ability to enhance the antibacterial activity of AgNPs against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including drug-resistant strains, when conjugated to the AgNP surface. The small, membranolytic protegrin-1 was the most efficient, suggesting that a short, rigid structure is not a limiting factor despite the constraints imposed by binding to the nanoparticle. Some of the conjugated AMPs/APs clearly affected the ability of nanoparticle to permeabilize the outer membrane of

Indexed as

antibacterial activityantimicrobial peptides and proteinscytotoxicitydrug-resistant bacteriananoparticles

Identifiers

PMID34975782
PMCPMC8719061
OpenAlexW4200066067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.