ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Evaluating Phage Tail Fiber Receptor-Binding Proteins Using a Luminescent Flow-Through 96-Well Plate Assay.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- From structure to design: experimental and AI-driven approaches in receptor-binding protein engineering for reprogramming phage host range.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The antagonistic coevolution between Pseudomonas sivasensis W-6 and the cold-adapted phage VW6S.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Phage-derived proteins: Advancing food safety through biocontrol and detection of foodborne pathogens.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- Optimizing phage therapy with artificial intelligence: a perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Principles, Methods, and Real-Time Applications of Bacteriophage-Based Pathogen Detection.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Phage P2-71 against multi-drug resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Genomic and biological insights of bacteriophages JNUWH1 and JNUWD in the arms race against bacterial resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Phages have demonstrated significant potential as therapeutics in bacterial disease control and as diagnostics due to their targeted bacterial host range. Host range has typically been defined by plaque assays; an important technique for therapeutic development that relies on the ability of a phage to form a plaque upon a lawn of monoculture bacteria. Plaque assays cannot be used to evaluate a phage's ability to recognize and adsorb to a bacterial strain of interest if the infection process is thwarted post-adsorption or is temporally delayed, and it cannot highlight which phages have the strongest adsorption characteristics. Other techniques, such as classic adsorption assays, are required to define a phage's "adsorptive host range." The issue shared amongst all adsorption assays, however, is that they rely on the use of a complete bacteriophage and thus inherently describe when all adsorption-specific machinery is working together to facilitate bacterial surface adsorption. These techniques cannot be used to examine individual interactions between a singular set of a phage's adsorptive machinery (like long tail fibers, short tail fibers, tail spikes, etc.) and that protein's targeted bacterial surface receptor. To address this gap in knowledge we have developed a high-throughput, filtration-based, bacterial binding assay that can evaluate the adsorptive capability of an individual set of a phage's adsorption machinery. In this manuscript, we used a fusion protein comprised of an N-terminal bioluminescent tag translationally fused to T4's long tail fiber binding tip (gp37) to evaluate and quantify gp37's relative adsorptive strength against the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.