Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34975779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Evaluating Phage Tail Fiber Receptor-Binding Proteins Using a Luminescent Flow-Through 96-Well Plate Assay.

Emma L Farquharson, Ashlyn Lightbown, Elsi Pulkkinen, Téa Russell, Brenda Werner, Sam R Nugen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing phage therapy with artificial intelligence: a perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Phage P2-71 against multi-drug resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma L FarquharsonNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Ashlyn LightbownNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Elsi PulkkinenNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Téa RussellNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Brenda WernerNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Sam R NugenNugen Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Accelerating phage evolution and tools via synthetic biology and machine learningR01EB027895 · NIBIB · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI NUGEN, SAM R · 2019 to 2024
$2.6M
Acquisition for Illumina HiSeq 2500S10OD010693 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI GRILLS, GEORGE S. · 2012 to 2012
$590k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027895NIH HHS S10 OD010693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phages have demonstrated significant potential as therapeutics in bacterial disease control and as diagnostics due to their targeted bacterial host range. Host range has typically been defined by plaque assays; an important technique for therapeutic development that relies on the ability of a phage to form a plaque upon a lawn of monoculture bacteria. Plaque assays cannot be used to evaluate a phage's ability to recognize and adsorb to a bacterial strain of interest if the infection process is thwarted post-adsorption or is temporally delayed, and it cannot highlight which phages have the strongest adsorption characteristics. Other techniques, such as classic adsorption assays, are required to define a phage's "adsorptive host range." The issue shared amongst all adsorption assays, however, is that they rely on the use of a complete bacteriophage and thus inherently describe when all adsorption-specific machinery is working together to facilitate bacterial surface adsorption. These techniques cannot be used to examine individual interactions between a singular set of a phage's adsorptive machinery (like long tail fibers, short tail fibers, tail spikes, etc.) and that protein's targeted bacterial surface receptor. To address this gap in knowledge we have developed a high-throughput, filtration-based, bacterial binding assay that can evaluate the adsorptive capability of an individual set of a phage's adsorption machinery. In this manuscript, we used a fusion protein comprised of an N-terminal bioluminescent tag translationally fused to T4's long tail fiber binding tip (gp37) to evaluate and quantify gp37's relative adsorptive strength against the

Indexed as

bacterial phage binding assaybacteriophage T4ECOR Reference LibraryNanoLuc luciferasephage adsorptionphage-host interactionphage receptor binding proteinstailed phages

Identifiers

PMID34975779
PMCPMC8719110
OpenAlexW4200177668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.