ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021
Machine Learning Enables Accurate and Rapid Prediction of Active Molecules Against Breast Cancer Cells.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring graph-based models for predicting active compounds against triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Multi-MoleScale: a multi-scale approach for molecular property prediction with graph contrastive and sequence learning.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning-based risk prediction model and analysis of risk factors for docetaxel-induced bone marrow suppression in breast cancer patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- MoleculeFormer is a GCN-transformer architecture for molecular property prediction.Communications biology · 2025Article
- ACLPred: an explainable machine learning and tree-based ensemble model for anticancer ligand prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Discovery of Novel Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Peptides Using a Machine Learning and Molecular Docking Approach.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Computational design of CDK1 inhibitors with enhanced target affinity and drug-likeness using deep-learning framework.Heliyon · 2024Article
- OLB-AC: toward optimizing ligand bioactivities through deep graph learning and activity cliffs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Graph neural networks are promising for phenotypic virtual screening on cancer cell lines.Biology methods & protocols · 2024Article
- FP-MAP: an extensive library of fingerprint-based molecular activity prediction tools.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
- DEEPCYPs: A deep learning platform for enhanced cytochrome P450 activity prediction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Development of machine learning classifiers to predict compound activity on prostate cancer cell lines.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
- A multi-task FP-GNN framework enables accurate prediction of selective PARP inhibitors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) has surpassed lung cancer as the most frequently occurring cancer, and it is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover or design new drug candidates for BC treatment. In this study, we first collected a series of structurally diverse datasets consisting of 33,757 active and 21,152 inactive compounds for 13 breast cancer cell lines and one normal breast cell line commonly used in in vitro antiproliferative assays. Predictive models were then developed using five conventional machine learning algorithms, including naïve Bayesian, support vector machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting, as well as five deep learning algorithms, including deep neural networks, graph convolutional networks, graph attention network, message passing neural networks, and Attentive FP. A total of 476 single models and 112 fusion models were constructed based on three types of molecular representations including molecular descriptors, fingerprints, and graphs. The evaluation results demonstrate that the best model for each BC cell subtype can achieve high predictive accuracy for the test sets with AUC values of 0.689-0.993. Moreover, important structural fragments related to BC cell inhibition were identified and interpreted. To facilitate the use of the model, an online webserver called ChemBC (http://chembc.idruglab.cn/) and its local version software (https://github.com/idruglab/ChemBC) were developed to predict whether compounds have potential inhibitory activity against BC cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.