ArticleBMC health services research2022
Evaluating Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals using the McKinsey 7-S Framework.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An exploration of the organizational performance of a care pathway applied to ambulatory surgery: a systems approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Identifying good organizational practices through the McKinsey 7S framework: A case study of an ophthalmology clinic.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Comparing the impact of 360-degree evaluation and conventional methods on the performance evaluation of Iranian nurses.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Organizational transformation elements for evidence-based practice by hospital nursing staff: a qualitative study using 7-S framework.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluating organisational performance in healthcare: a mixed-method study using the McKinsey 7S framework.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Perceptions of organizational effectiveness in public hospitals: Insights from frontline healthcare workers in Ghana.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Rethinking international financing for health to better respond to future pandemics.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- What Makes a Hospital Excellent? A Qualitative Study on the Organization and Management of Five Leading Public Hospitals in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Recent Advancements in Emerging Technologies for Healthcare Management Systems: A Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined non-financial aspects of the organizational performance of public hospitals from the perspective of hospital physicians; the obtained results were analyzed to identify the necessary improvements in organizational performance.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of multidisciplinary public hospitals on a group of 249 randomly selected physicians from 22 in-patient departments or clinics operating in the Warsaw region. The study data was collected using the structured World Health Organization questionnaires (to be filled out by respondents) assessing the hospital's organizational performance variables qualified according to the McKinsey 7-S Framework. Epidata software version 3.1 was used for data entry, and the analysis was carried out in the SPSS software, version 19. The results of the organization evaluation are presented in the McKinsey 7-S Framework diagram. Key elements of the performance factors were grouped into 'stens', and the sten values were expressed as arithmetic means. Normal distribution of the stens was validated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The significance of differences between the analyzed stens was compared with the paired Student t-test. The interdependence of the variables was determined using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.
resultsThe results revealed a significant difference (p <0.05) in the respondents' assessment of social (a mean score of 2.58) and technical (a mean score of 2.80) organizational aspects of the hospital operation. Scores for all variables were low. The social elements of an organization with the lowest score included 'staff', and in it the aspect - 'efforts are made to inspire employees at the lowest levels of the organization', 'skills' involving the learning style followed by the management/managerial staff, and 'management style' (average scores of 2.38, 2.56, 2.61, respectively).
conclusionConsistently with the existing literature, social factors were shown to play a more significant role in the management and they therefore deserve careful attention and more recognition when identifying and improving the key aspects affecting the organizational performance of public hospitals. Technical elements (strategy, structure, system) are important, but were demonstrated to have limited effect on the organizational operations geared towards ensuring effective functioning of a public hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.