Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34974546›Full record

ArticlePathologica2021

Survey on postmortem screening and management of COVID-19 related deaths.

Sameera A Gunawardena, Cristina Cordeiro, Giancarlo Di Vella, Dinesh Fernando, Saminda Rajapaksha, Ravindra Samaranayake, Anna Sapino, Ajith Tennakoon, Sandacan Waduge, Noel Woodford and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sameera A GunawardenaDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Cristina CordeiroInstituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses, Coimbra, Portugal.
Giancarlo Di VellaGruppo Italiano di Patologia Forense, University of Turin, Italy.
Dinesh FernandoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Saminda RajapakshaInstitute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ravindra SamaranayakeDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Anna SapinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy on behalf of SIAPEC-IAP.
Ajith TennakoonInstitute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sandacan WadugeDistrict General Hospital, Badulla, Sri Lanka.
Noel WoodfordDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University & Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Southbank, Victoria, Australia.
Samantha WijeratneTeaching Hospital Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka.
Riccardo ZojaInstitute of Legal and Forensic Medicine, University of Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a high case fatality rate in some countries even thought the majority of cases are asymptomatic. Scientific studies on this novel virus is limited and there is uncertainty regarding the best practices for death investigations both in terms of detection of the disease as well as autopsy safety. An online survey was conducted to identify how different institutions responded to the screening and management of dead bodies during the early phase of the pandemic from January to May. A questionnaire was developed using Google Forms and data was collected from 14 different forensic and pathological institutions in 9 countries. None of the institutions had performed any screening prior to March. Four institutions stated that screening was done routinely. In total, 322 cases had been screened using RT-PCR, out of which 40 positive cases were detected among four institutions. The commonest types of samples obtained were nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs which also had the highest rates of positivity followed by tracheal swab. Blood, swabs from cut surfaces of lung and lung tissue also gave positive results in some cases. Majority of the positive cases were > 65 years with a history suggestive of respiratory infection and were clinically suspected to have COVID-19 before death. Except for one institution which performed limited dissections, standard autopsies were conducted on all positive cases. Disposal of bodies involved the use of sealed body bags and labelling as COVID positive. Funeral rites were restricted and none of the institutions advocated cremation. There were no reports of disease transmission to those who handled COVID positive bodies.

Indexed as

COVID-19AutopsyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesdeath investigation during pandemicshigh risk autopsypostmortem screening for infectionsSARS CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34974546
PMCPMC8720393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.