Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34974541›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2022

An update on long-acting therapies in chronic sight-threatening eye diseases of the posterior segment: AMD, DMO, RVO, uveitis and glaucoma.

Faruque Ghanchi, Rupert Bourne, Susan M Downes, Richard Gale, Christina Rennie, Ian Tapply, Sobha Sivaprasad

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Adoption patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in retinal disease.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanoparticles in intraocular drug delivery.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Faruque GhanchiBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK. Faruque.Ghanchi@bthft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-8162
Rupert BourneCambridge Eye Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Susan M DownesOxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Richard GaleYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of York, York, UK.
Christina RennieSouthampton Eye Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-4758
Ian TapplyCambridge Eye Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Sobha SivaprasadMoorfields Eye Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the real-world setting, there is suboptimal compliance with treatments that require frequent administration and assessment visits. This undertreatment frequently has negative consequences in eye disease and carries a real risk to vision. For example, patients with glaucoma risk progression of visual loss even with a small number of missed doses, and patients with neovascular age-related degeneration (nAMD) who fail to attend a bi-monthly clinic appointment to receive an intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug injections may lose the initial vision gains in vision. Protracted regular treatment schedules represent a high burden not only for patients and families, but also healthcare professionals, systems, and ultimately society too. There has been a clear need for longer-acting therapies that reduce the frequency, and therefore the burden, of treatment interventions. Several longer-acting interventions for nAMD, diabetic macular oedema, retinal vein occlusion, uveitis and glaucoma have either been developed or are in late-phase development, some of which employ novel mechanisms of actions, and all of which of promise longer (≥3 month) treatment intervals. This review delivers an overview of anti-VEGF agents with longer durations of action, DARPins, bispecific anti-VEGF/Ang2 therapies, anti-PDGF and anti-integrin therapy, Rho-kinase inhibitors, the Port Delivery System, steroids, gene therapy for retina and uveitis, and for glaucoma, ROCK inhibitors, implants and plugs, and SLT laser and MIGS. The review also refers to the potential of artificial intelligence to tailor treatment efficacy with a resulting reduction in treatment burden.

Indexed as

GlaucomaMacular EdemaUveitisAngiogenesis InhibitorsArtificial IntelligenceBevacizumabHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID34974541
PMCPMC9151779
OpenAlexW4205502216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.