Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34974419›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Basic Concepts and Technical Keys to Clinical Success.

Sang Gu Lee, Yong Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. [Lumbar disc herniation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Nerve root retraction time during lumbar endoscopic discectomy: association with new onset radiculitis, a post-operative neurologic complication.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang Gu LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Yong AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea ns-ay@hanmail.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen microdiscectomy is the gold standard surgical technique for radiculopathy with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) has been developed as an effective and minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. As a result of these remarkable technical evolutions, the clinical outcomes of TELD have become comparable to those of conventional open surgery. However, considerable learning curves and endoscopy-related adverse events may emerge as critical problems.

objectiveThe objective of this article was to inform on the basic principles, surgical techniques, and keys to clinical success in preventing complications.

methodsA narrative review of the literature focused on the surgical indications, technical tips, complications, and learning curve of the full-endoscopic procedure was performed.

resultsFirst, the transforaminal endoscopic system should access as close as possible to the target point, avoiding exiting nerve root irritation. Second, selective removal of the herniated disc fragments after sufficiently releasing the annular anchorage parts is essential to avoid incomplete decompression or prevent an early recurrence. Third, the endpoint of the procedure can be determined at the point of solid pulsation and free mobilization of the nerve root. Finally, surgeons should always ensure that the anatomical layers discriminate the neural tissue and disc material during the procedure.Some authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of TELD through randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systemic reviews. According to these studies, the clinical outcomes of TELD are not inferior to those of open discectomy, with an earlier recovery period and fewer complications.

conclusionsThe full-endoscopic transforaminal discectomy technique for soft LDH is an effective alternative with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in appropriately selected patients. Given recent technical developments, the surgical indications for TELD will be broader and the clinical outcomes will be more reliable.

Indexed as

complicationdiscectomyendoscopiclumbar discpercutaneoustransforaminal

Identifiers

PMID34974419
PMCPMC9421271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.