ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021
The History of Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Surgery.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computed tomography imaging for exploring the appropriate angle of a visible Trephine in endoscopic spine lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Safe distances for transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion under one-hole split endoscopy: three-dimensional reconstruction measurement of 1-degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis at the LJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- A novel endoscope-port unit for lumbar microendoscopic surgery: a single-center case series review.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion microscopic safe operating area: a three-dimensional model study based on computed tomography imaging.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Comparison of one-hole split endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: a one-year retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout its evolution, spine surgery has migrated toward less invasiveness. For posterior lumbar surgery, percutaneous techniques together with endoscopic visualization allow for the smallest surgical corridor. Initially, this approach utilized the natural entry point into the spinal canal via the transforaminal approach via Kamin's triangle. The interlaminar endoscopic technique was subsequently developed to address central disc herniations at L5-S1, where the transforaminal approach can be challenging to reach the surgical pathology. More recently, the dual portal posterior lumbar endoscopic technique provides for yet another method of performing posterior lumbar surgery, expanding its versatility, including the treatment of spinal stenosis. In addition to treating disc pathology, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusions are now performed in select patients in the ambulatory surgery setting. Despite the dramatic advantages of advanced minimally invasive procedures, the adoption of endoscopic spine surgery in everyday practice has lagged. The main obstacle to adoption appears to be the difficult learning curve of endoscopic surgery combined with the fact that traditional microdiscectomy surgery remains one of the most successful operations in our treatment armamentarium. The successful future of endoscopic spine surgery will depend on our ability to address the learning curve problem. In the future, this problem may be addressed through the use to computer-assisted navigation, robotic assistance, and an integrated operating room suite that improves the efficiencies and ergonomics of increasingly complex surgical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.