Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34973147›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2022

Is DNA repair controlled by a biological logic circuit?

Philip G Penketh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip G PenkethDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. philip.penketh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-4086
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possible utilization of biological logic circuit(s) in the integration and regulation of DNA repair is discussed. The author believes this mode of regulation likely applies to many other areas of cell biology; however, there are currently more experimental data to support its involvement in the control of DNA repair. Sequential logic processes always require a clock to orchestrate the orderly processing of events. In the proposed hypothesis, the pulses in the expression of p53 serve this function. Given the many advantages of logic type control, one would expect that in the course of ~ 3 billion years of evolution, where single cell life forms were likely the only forms of life, a biological logic type control system would have evolved to control at least some biological processes. Several other required components in addition to the 'clock' have been identified, such as; a method to temporarily inactivate repair processes when they are not required (e.g. the reversible inactivation of MGMT, a suicide repair protein, by phosphorylation); this prevents complex DNA repair systems with potentially overlapping repair functions from interfering with each other.

Indexed as

DNA RepairLogicHumansBiological clockDigital controlDNA repairLogic controlMethylationOscillatorPhosphorylation

Identifiers

PMID34973147
PMCPMC8894308
OpenAlexW4206733042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.