Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34973066›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2022

Contribution of voluntary fortified foods to micronutrient intake in The Netherlands.

Marjolein H de Jong, Eline L Nawijn, Janneke Verkaik-Kloosterman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Food supplements and fortified foods: benefits, risks and approaches to consumer protection].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin E.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for iron.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marjolein H de JongNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. marjolein.de.jong@rivm.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-2414
Eline L NawijnNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Janneke Verkaik-KloostermanNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the Netherlands, voluntary fortification of foods with micronutrients is allowed under strict regulations. This study investigates the impact of voluntary food fortification practices in the Netherlands on the frequency and type of fortified food consumption and on the micronutrient intakes of the Dutch population.

methodsData of the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey (2012-2016; N = 4314; 1-79 year) and the Dutch Food Composition Database (NEVO version 2016) was used. To determine if voluntary fortified foods could be classified as healthy foods, criteria of the Dutch Wheel of Five were used. Habitual intakes of users and non-users of voluntary food fortification were calculated using Statistical Program to Assess Dietary Exposure (SPADE) and compared.

resultsWithin the Dutch population, 75% could be classified as user of voluntary fortified foods. Consumed voluntary fortified foods were mostly within food groups 'Fats and Oils', 'Non-alcoholic Beverages' and 'Dairy products and Substitutes' and fell mostly outside the Wheel of Five. Voluntary foods contributed between 9 and 78% to total micronutrient intake of users. Users had up to 64% higher habitual micronutrient intakes, compared to non-users. These higher intakes resulted into lower risks on inadequate intakes, and did not contribute to increased risks of excessive intakes.

conclusionAlthough voluntary fortified foods increased micronutrient intakes, most of these foods cannot be classified as healthy foods. Future studies should study the association between higher micronutrient intakes and (potential) excessive intakes of e.g. saturated fat and sugar to better understand the role of voluntary fortified foods in a healthy food pattern.

Indexed as

DietFood, FortifiedEatingMicronutrientsNetherlandsMicronutrientsHabitual intakesMicronutrientsThe NetherlandsVoluntary food fortification

Identifiers

PMID34973066
PMCPMC8921121
OpenAlexW4205906031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.