Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34973058›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2022

Assessing Cognitive Decline in High-Functioning Spanish-Speaking Patients: High Score Base Rates on the Spanish-Language NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.

Justin E Karr, Monica Rivera Mindt, Grant L Iverson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Algorithms for Operationalizing Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the Spanish-Language NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin E KarrDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Monica Rivera MindtDepartment of Psychology and Latin American and Latino Studies Institute, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA.
Grant L IversonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

A Multi-Study Replication of the Predictive Value of Intra-Individual Variabilityon Long-Term Changes in Cognition, Health and AffectR01AG050720 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RAST, PHILIPPE · 2016 to 2018
$741k
National Academy of Neuropsychology Clinical ResearchNIA NIH HHS R01 AG050720NIH HHS R01AG050720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrior research has focused on the normal frequency of obtaining low scores on a neuropsychological test battery, but few studies have examined the normal frequency of obtaining high scores. This study involved the preparation of high score multivariate base rates for the Spanish-language National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB).

methodParticipants included 250 healthy Latinx adults (age range: 19-80) from the Spanish-language NIHTB-CB normative sample who completed the full battery (two crystallized and four fluid cognition tests). Multivariate base rates, stratified by education, crystallized ability, and sociocultural characteristics, quantified the frequency at which participants obtained one or more "high" fluid test scores (i.e., ≥50th, ≥63rd, ≥75th, ≥84th, ≥91st, ≥95th, and ≥ 98th percentile).

resultsIt was common for participants to obtain one or more high scores (i.e., 50.8% obtained one or more scores ≥84th percentile) and uncommon for participants to obtain "no" high scores, especially when using non-conventional thresholds for defining a high score (i.e., 10.8% obtained no scores ≥50th percentile). High scores were more commonly obtained by participants with greater education and higher crystallized ability, who were bilingual, born and educated within the United States, and from higher income households.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that participants administered multiple neuropsychological tests commonly obtain high scores, and that the frequency of high scores varies by education, crystallized ability, and sociocultural characteristics. The absence of high scores may be indicative of cognitive impairment among examinees who are higher functioning, have greater education, and have specific sociocultural characteristics (e.g., bilingualism, higher socioeconomic status).

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLanguageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionHumansMiddle AgedNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Neuropsychological TestsUnited StatesYoung AdultAssessmentCross-cultural/minorityNorms/normative studies

Identifiers

PMID34973058
PMCPMC9297149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.