Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34973020›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Expert Characteristics: Implications for Expert Systems.

Konstantinos G Papageorgiou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Konstantinos G PapageorgiouIonian University, Department of Informatics, Kerkira, Greece. cconstantinoss@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While expert systems are artificial intelligence (AI) agents, they share many common characteristics with human experts. As technology progresses, such systems are not just able to make simple decisions following "simplistic" linear logical protocols; they "behave" as real experts in at least two ways: by demonstrating superb decision-making skills and by conforming to the social norms for expertise, i.e., they "feel" as human experts. A review of the common characteristics of human experts may have important implications for the direction of the development for such systems. Implications for bioinformatics and future research (especially concerning the accompanying concept of "expert generalist") are also discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExpert SystemsHumansTechnologyEpistēmēExpert generalistExpert systemsMethodology of science

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.