Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34972770›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Implementation, efficacy and cost effectiveness of the unified protocol in a blended format for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, superiority controlled trial in the Spanish National Health System.

J Osma, Laura Martínez-García, Óscar Peris-Baquero, María Vicenta Navarro-Haro, Alberto González-Pérez, Carlos Suso-Ribera

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04304911 (Implementation, Effficacy and Cost-effective Study of the Unified Protocol in Blended Format for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in the Spanish National Health System), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04304911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Implementation, Effficacy and Cost-effective Study of the Unified Protocol in Blended Format for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in the Spanish National Health System

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria AragónRan2023 to 2025Enrolled92ConditionsEmotional Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive DisorderArmsBlended intervention (UP-APP), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J OsmaDepartamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain osma@unizar.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-318X
Laura Martínez-GarcíaDepartamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
Óscar Peris-BaqueroDepartamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
María Vicenta Navarro-HaroDepartamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
Alberto González-PérezUniversitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-9357
Carlos Suso-RiberaUniversitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmotional disorders (EDs) have become the most prevalent psychological disorders in the general population, which has boosted the economic burden associated with their management. Approximately half of the individuals do not receive adequate treatment. Consequently, finding solutions to deliver cost-effective treatments for EDs has become a key goal of today's clinical psychology. Blended treatments, a combination of face-to-face and online interventions, have emerged as a potential solution to the previous. The Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of EDs (UP) might serve this purpose, as it can be applied to a variety of disorders simultaneously and its manualised format makes it suitable for blended interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a multicentre, randomised, superiority, clinical trial. Participants will be 310 individuals with a diagnosis of an ED. They will be randomised to a treatment as usual (individual cognitive behavioural therapy) or a UP condition in a blended format (face-to-face individual UP +online, app-based UP). Primary outcomes will be ED diagnostic criteria and depression and anxiety symptoms. Cost efficiency of the intervention, app usability, as well as opinion and confidence in the treatment will also be evaluated. Assessment points will include baseline and 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after UP treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approvals by the Ethics Research Committee of Navarra, Castellón, Euskadi, Castilla y León, Extremadura, Lleida and Aragón. The study is currently under an approval process by the Ethics Research Committees of all the remaining collaborating centres. Outcomes will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conference meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04304911.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicHealth Care CostsHumansMood DisordersMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeanxiety disordersdepression & mood disordersmental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID34972770
PMCPMC8720993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.