Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34972760›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Validation of visual estimation of neonatal jaundice in low-income and middle-income countries: a multicentre observational cohort study.

Gary L Darmstadt, Davidson H Hamer, John B Carlin, Prakash M Jeena, Eduardo Mazzi, Anil Narang, A K Deorari, Emmanuel Addo-Yobo, Mak Azad Chowdhury, Praveen Kumar and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Gary L DarmstadtDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA gdarmsta@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-5824
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-1495
John B CarlinClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute & The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Prakash M JeenaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa.
Eduardo MazziDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital del Nino Dr Ovidio Aliaga Uria, La Paz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Anil NarangDepartments of Pediatrics and Medical Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
A K DeorariDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Emmanuel Addo-YoboSchool of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Mak Azad ChowdhuryDepartment of Neonatology, Dhaka Shishu Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Praveen KumarDepartments of Pediatrics and Medical Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-8787
Yaw Abu-SarkodieKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kojo Yeboah-AntwiDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3516-9266
Pallab RayDepartments of Pediatrics and Medical Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
Andres E BartosDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Materno-Infantil, La Paz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
Samir K SahaChild Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Eric FooteDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Rajiv BahlNewborn Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7936-6985
Martin W WeberWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INBoston University · USKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHStanford University · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBangladesh Shishu (Children) Hospital & Institute · BDChild Health Research Foundation · BDThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine the sensitivity and specificity of neonatal jaundice visual estimation by primary healthcare workers (PHWs) and physicians as predictors of hyperbilirubinaemia.

designMulticentre observational cohort study.

settingHospitals in Chandigarh and Delhi, India; Dhaka, Bangladesh; Durban, South Africa; Kumasi, Ghana; La Paz, Bolivia.

participantsNeonates aged 1-20 days (n=2642) who presented to hospitals for evaluation of acute illness. Infants referred for any reason from another health facility or those needing immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Infants were evaluated for distribution (head, trunk, distal extremities) and degree (mild, moderate, severe) of jaundice by PHWs and physicians. Serum bilirubin level was determined for infants with jaundice, and analyses of sensitivity and specificity of visual estimations of jaundice used bilirubin thresholds of >260 µmol/L (need for phototherapy) and >340 µmol/L (need for emergency intervention in at-risk and preterm babies).

results1241 (47.0%) neonates had jaundice. High sensitivity for detecting neonates with serum bilirubin >340 µmol/L was found for 'any jaundice of the distal extremities (palms or soles) OR deep jaundice of the trunk or head' for both PHWs (89%-100%) and physicians (81%-100%) across study sites; specificity was more variable. 'Any jaundice of the distal extremities' identified by PHWs and physicians had sensitivity of 71%-100% and specificity of 55%-95%, excluding La Paz. For the bilirubin threshold >260 µmol/L, 'any jaundice of the distal extremities OR deep jaundice of the trunk or head' had the highest sensitivity across sites (PHWs: 58%-93%, physicians: 55%-98%).

conclusionsIn settings where serum bilirubin cannot be measured, neonates with any jaundice on the distal extremities should be referred to a hospital for evaluation and management, where delays in serum bilirubin measurement and appropriate treatment are anticipated following referral, the higher sensitivity sign, any jaundice on the distal extremities or deep jaundice of the trunk or head, may be preferred.

Indexed as

Jaundice, NeonatalAdolescentAdultBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDeveloping CountriesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSouth AfricaYoung Adultcommunity child healthepidemiologyneonatologyprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID34972760
PMCPMC8720979
OpenAlexW4206324593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.