ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Strut Onlay Allograft in Revision Arthroplasty: Osseous Union and Clinical Outcome.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allograft strut-screw construct in the management of total elbow periprosthetic fractures: a surgical technique with high complication rate.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Proximal humerus reconstruction in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral bone loss using a lower trapezius tendon transfer with Achilles tendon-bone allograft: surgical technique and report of 2 cases.JSES international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the clinical outcome and the osseous union of strut onlay allografts (SOAs) used as adjunct in revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients that had previously undergone SOA augmentation were considered for inclusion. Patients were invited to provide information for the following: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol five dimension score (EQ-5D) and Parker mobility score. Osseous union rates between SOA and the host bone were determined by radiograph with the Emerson classification system. Bone mineral density was measured via quantitative computed tomography.
resultsSeventeen patients were identified, at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. The median total WOMAC score was 22 [interquartile range (IQR)=21]. The median EQ-5D score was 0.887 (IQR=0.350) (time trade-off). The Parker Mobility Score was 8.0 (IQR=3.5). Emerson stages of radiographic graft to host union were 'rounding off' in one case, 'partial bridging' in three and 'complete bridging' in 13. Quantitative computed tomography showed an average bone mineral density of approximately 1,300 mg/cm3.
conclusionFrom our findings, it is concluded that SOAs used in revision total joint arthroplasty provide promising results and are recommended for broader clinical use. A complete osseous union between host and graft bone was observed in the majority of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.