ArticleTherapie
Global research output in 'pharmacovigilance' during 2010-2020.
Article in Therapie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid spread of Covid-19 pandemic globally has thrust drugs safety into the spotlight and the public is now more aware of the role of healthcare professionals and health regulators. The present study aimed to measure the global research landscape on pharmacovigilance (PV) indexed in Scopus database for eleven years period spanning from 2010-2020. The study has sought to use quantitative and visualization technologies for data analysis and interpretation. The search strategy accumulated a total of 2052 global publications data on PV. The findings disclose that the global research productivity on PV registered 8.74% average growth rate (AGR) and 7.38% compound average growth rate (CAGR). The mean relative growth rate (RGR) and doubling time (DT) of PV global publications for the 11 years is 0.27 and 3.03, respectively. The average number of authors per paper (AAPP) is 1.52 and average productivity per author (PPA) is 0.68. The authorship patterns in PV research shows collaborative trend as most of the publications have been published by multiple authors (80.75%). The mean values of degree of collaboration (DC), collaboration index (CI), collaboration coefficient (CC) and modified collaboration coefficient (MCC) during the selected period of study are 0.79, 2.74, 0.72, and 0.73, respectively which highly significant and indicates the better authorship collaborations. France is the bellwether in PV related scientific research as produced the highest number of publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.