Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34972505›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Multi-task learning for Chinese clinical named entity recognition with external knowledge.

Ming Cheng, Shufeng Xiong, Fei Li, Pan Liang, Jianbo Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming ChengDepartment of Medical Information, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. fccchengm@zzu.edu.cn.
Shufeng XiongColleges of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fei LiSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Pan LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNamed entity recognition (NER) on Chinese electronic medical/healthcare records has attracted significantly attentions as it can be applied to building applications to understand these records. Most previous methods have been purely data-driven, requiring high-quality and large-scale labeled medical data. However, labeled data is expensive to obtain, and these data-driven methods are difficult to handle rare and unseen entities.

methodsTo tackle these problems, this study presents a novel multi-task deep neural network model for Chinese NER in the medical domain. We incorporate dictionary features into neural networks, and a general secondary named entity segmentation is used as auxiliary task to improve the performance of the primary task of named entity recognition.

resultsIn order to evaluate the proposed method, we compare it with other currently popular methods, on three benchmark datasets. Two of the datasets are publicly available, and the other one is constructed by us. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves 91.07% average f-measure on the two public datasets and 87.05% f-measure on private dataset.

conclusionsThe comparison results of different models demonstrated the effectiveness of our model. The proposed model outperformed traditional statistical models.

Indexed as

NamesNeural Networks, ComputerAttentionChinaElectronic Health RecordsHumansChinese clinical named entity recognitionDeep neural networkDictionary featuresMulti-task learning

Identifiers

PMID34972505
PMCPMC8719412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.