ArticlePloS one2021
Super.Complex: A supervised machine learning pipeline for molecular complex detection in protein-interaction networks.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micro-functional protein complexes mining in biological intelligent computing: a weighted network approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted tools to understand the structural biology of the synapse.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- ClusterONE Web: a tool for discovering and analyzing overlapping protein complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Identification of RMP24 and RMP64, human ribonuclease MRP-specific protein components.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Building, benchmarking, and exploring perturbative maps of transcriptional and morphological data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- HetFCM: functional co-module discovery by heterogeneous network co-clustering.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Molecular complex detection in protein interaction networks through reinforcement learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Uncharacterized Proteins CxORFx: Subinteractome Analysis and Prognostic Significance in Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Insights gained from single-cell analysis of immune cells in tofacitinib treatment of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.JCI insight · 2022Article
- AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Characterization of protein complexes, i.e. sets of proteins assembling into a single larger physical entity, is important, as such assemblies play many essential roles in cells such as gene regulation. From networks of protein-protein interactions, potential protein complexes can be identified computationally through the application of community detection methods, which flag groups of entities interacting with each other in certain patterns. Most community detection algorithms tend to be unsupervised and assume that communities are dense network subgraphs, which is not always true, as protein complexes can exhibit diverse network topologies. The few existing supervised machine learning methods are serial and can potentially be improved in terms of accuracy and scalability by using better-suited machine learning models and parallel algorithms. Here, we present Super.Complex, a distributed, supervised AutoML-based pipeline for overlapping community detection in weighted networks. We also propose three new evaluation measures for the outstanding issue of comparing sets of learned and known communities satisfactorily. Super.Complex learns a community fitness function from known communities using an AutoML method and applies this fitness function to detect new communities. A heuristic local search algorithm finds maximally scoring communities, and a parallel implementation can be run on a computer cluster for scaling to large networks. On a yeast protein-interaction network, Super.Complex outperforms 6 other supervised and 4 unsupervised methods. Application of Super.Complex to a human protein-interaction network with ~8k nodes and ~60k edges yields 1,028 protein complexes, with 234 complexes linked to SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19 virus, with 111 uncharacterized proteins present in 103 learned complexes. Super.Complex is generalizable with the ability to improve results by incorporating domain-specific features. Learned community characteristics can also be transferred from existing applications to detect communities in a new application with no known communities. Code and interactive visualizations of learned human protein complexes are freely available at: https://sites.google.com/view/supercomplex/super-complex-v3-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.