Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34972123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluating the citywide Edinburgh 20mph speed limit intervention effects on traffic speed and volume: A pre-post observational evaluation.

Glenna F Nightingale, Andrew James Williams, Ruth F Hunter, James Woodcock, Kieran Turner, Claire L Cleland, Graham Baker, Michael Kelly, Andy Cope, Frank Kee and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Glenna F NightingaleThe Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research (SCPHRP), School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0110-3939
Andrew James WilliamsPopulation and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-8836
Ruth F HunterCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
James WoodcockInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kieran TurnerThe Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research (SCPHRP), School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Claire L ClelandCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Graham BakerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Michael KellyInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andy CopeSustrans, Cathedral Square, College Green, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8506-5054
Frank KeeCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Karen MiltonNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Charlie FosterUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ruth JepsonThe Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research (SCPHRP), School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul KellyPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 15/82/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTraffic speed is important to public health as it is a major contributory factor to collision risk and casualty severity. 20mph (32km/h) speed limit interventions are an increasingly common approach to address this transport and health challenge, but a more developed evidence base is needed to understand their effects. This study describes the changes in traffic speed and traffic volume in the City of Edinburgh, pre- and 12 months post-implementation of phased city-wide 20mph speed limits from 2016-2018.

methodsThe City of Edinburgh Council collected speed and volume data across one full week (24 hours a day) pre- and post-20mph speed limits for 66 streets. The pre- and post-speed limit intervention data were compared using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and basic t-tests. The changes were assessed at different aggregations and evaluated for statistical significance (alpha = 0.05). A mixed effects model was used to model speed reduction, in the presence of key variables such as baseline traffic speed and time of day.

resultsCity-wide, a statistically significant reduction in mean speed of 1.34mph (95% CI 0.95 to 1.72) was observed at 12 months post-implementation, representing a 5.7% reduction. Reductions in speed were observed throughout the day and across the week, and larger reductions in speed were observed on roads with higher initial speeds. Mean 7-day volume of traffic was found to be lower by 86 vehicles (95% CI: -112 to 286) representing a reduction of 2.4% across the city of Edinburgh (p = 0.39) but with the direction of effect uncertain.

conclusionsThe implementation of the city-wide 20mph speed limit intervention was associated with meaningful reductions in traffic speeds but not volume. The reduction observed in road traffic speed may act as a mechanism to lessen the frequency and severity of collisions and casualties, increase road safety, and improve liveability.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAccidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingCitiesEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth PolicyHumansLogistic ModelsSafetyScotlandTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34972123
PMCPMC8719778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.