Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34972114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The annual cycle for whimbrel populations using the Western Atlantic Flyway.

Bryan D Watts, Fletcher M Smith, Chance Hines, Laura Duval, Diana J Hamilton, Tim Keyes, Julie Paquet, Lisa Pirie-Dominix, Jennie Rausch, Barry Truitt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bryan D WattsCenter for Conservation Biology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-6951
Fletcher M SmithCenter for Conservation Biology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7617-8142
Chance HinesCenter for Conservation Biology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Laura DuvalCenter for Conservation Biology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Diana J HamiltonMount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Tim KeyesNon-Game Conservation Section, Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Brunswick, Georgia, United States of America.
Julie PaquetCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Lisa Pirie-DominixCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada.
Jennie RauschCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
Barry TruittThe Nature Conservancy's Volgenau Virginia Coast Reserve, Nassawadox, Virginia, United States of America.
Brad WinnManoment Inc., Manomet, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Paul WoodardCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many long-distance migratory birds use habitats that are scattered across continents and confront hazards throughout the annual cycle that may be population-limiting. Identifying where and when populations spend their time is fundamental to effective management. We tracked 34 adult whimbrels (Numenius phaeopus) from two breeding populations (Mackenzie Delta and Hudson Bay) with satellite transmitters to document the structure of their annual cycles. The two populations differed in their use of migratory pathways and their seasonal schedules. Mackenzie Delta whimbrels made long (22,800 km) loop migrations with different autumn and spring routes. Hudson Bay whimbrels made shorter (17,500 km) and more direct migrations along the same route during autumn and spring. The two populations overlap on the winter grounds and within one spring staging area. Mackenzie Delta whimbrels left the breeding ground, arrived on winter grounds, left winter grounds and arrived on spring staging areas earlier compared to whimbrels from Hudson Bay. For both populations, migration speed was significantly higher during spring compared to autumn migration. Faster migration was achieved by having fewer and shorter stopovers en route. We identified five migratory staging areas including four that were used during autumn and two that were used during spring. Whimbrels tracked for multiple years had high (98%) fidelity to staging areas. We documented dozens of locations where birds stopped for short periods along nearly all migration routes. The consistent use of very few staging areas suggests that these areas are integral to the annual cycle of both populations and have high conservation value.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationAnimalsCanadaCharadriiformesGeographySatellite CommunicationsSeasonsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34972114
PMCPMC8719713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.