Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34971422›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

New ways of treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft: does the combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and cerclage improve the healing process?

Franziska von der Helm, Annabel Fenwick, Jan Reuter, Leonard Adolf-Lisitano, Edgar Mayr, Stefan Förch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanical evaluation of cerclage wiring in plated tibia fractures using human and synthetic specimens.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franziska von der HelmKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. franziska.vonderhelm@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-8909
Annabel FenwickKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Jan ReuterKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Leonard Adolf-LisitanoKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Edgar MayrKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan FörchKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe humeral shaft fracture is a rare fracture of the long bones with various treatment options. Dreaded complications such as lesions of the radial nerve or non-unions make the decision for what kind of therapy option more difficult. Biomechanically the upper arm is mostly exposed to rotational forces, which affect intramedullary nail osteosynthesis. Additive cerclage may compensate for these in spiral fractures. The aim of this study is to investigate what effect a combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and limited invasive cerclage has on the rate of healing. In addition, this study addresses the question if complications arise as a result of cerclage.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 109 patients were evaluated, who, during a period of 6 years, underwent operative treatment of a humerus shaft fracture with a combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and additive cerclage. The primary end point was to establish the rate of healing. A secondary end point was to evaluate complications such as infections and damage to the nerve. This was followed by an examination of patient files and X-ray images and a statistical analysis with SPSS. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe healing process shows a non-union rate of 2.6%, and complications such as secondary radial nerve lesions of 4.6%. The antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis with limited invasive, additive cerclage reduces the risk of non-union and does not lead to an increased risk of iatrogenic damage to the radial nerve. Wound healing was not impaired and there were no infections through the cerclage in our patient cohort.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumeral FracturesBone NailsFracture HealingHumansHumerusPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis of the humerusCerclageHumeral shaft fractureLesion of the radial nerveNon-union

Identifiers

PMID34971422
PMCPMC9360159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.