ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Role of MDCT in evaluating prothesis size prior to percutaneous transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) prosthesis sizing prior to ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) percutaneous closure. Seventy consecutive patients were included in this retrospective bicentric study between May 2012 and June 2018. All underwent cardiac MDCT (primarily performed to rule out abnormal venous pulmonary return and coronary anomaly) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before transcatheter closure: dimensions of the defect and peripheral rims were measured. Measurements of the defect obtained at TEE and MDCT were compared to prosthesis size. Our primary objective was the comparison of ASD maximal diameter obtained at MDCT (CT-Dmax) to prosthesis size. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland Altman plots and linear regression were calculated. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were calculated for MDCT defect measurements. Forty-three patients were finally included for defect measurements: 17 patients did not undergo transcatheter closure, and 10 had incomplete data. For CT-Dmax, ICC was 0.88 (CI 95% = [0.78-0.93]; p = 0.06); mean difference was - 0.8 ± 5.7 mm; regression linear equation was 0.9 × + 3.2 (p < 0.001). For maximal diameter at TEE versus prosthesis size, ICC was 0.46 (CI 95% = [0.21-0.61]; p = 0.003); mean difference was-6.0 ± 8.2 mm; regression linear equation was 0.91 × + 7.6 (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer agreement for CT-Dmax were 0.97 (CI 95% = [0.95-0.98]) and 0.86 (CI 95% = [0.73-0.93]) respectively. MDCT is a reliable tool for sizing the defect of ostium secundum ASD, making it a complement or even an alternative to pre-procedural TEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34971420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.