Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34971005›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2022

Transfusion practice in the bleeding critically ill: An international online survey-The TRACE-2 survey.

Sanne de Bruin, Dorus Eggermont, Robin van Bruggen, Dirk de Korte, Thomas W L Scheeren, Jan Bakker, Alexander P J Vlaar, Cardiovascular Dynamics Section and Transfusion Task Force of the ESICM

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sanne de BruinDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-9325
Dorus EggermontDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robin van BruggenDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk de KorteDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-7377
Thomas W L ScheerenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Dynamics Section and Transfusion Task Force of the ESICM

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/12/1/29419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransfusion is very common in the intensive care unit (ICU), but practice is highly variable, as has recently been shown in non-bleeding critically ill patients practices survey. Bleeding patients in ICU require different blood products across a range of specific patient categories. We hypothesize that a large variety in transfusion practice exists in bleeding patients. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsAn international online survey was performed among physicians working in the ICU. Transfusion practice in massively and non-massively bleeding patients was examined, including transfusion ratios, thresholds, and the presence of transfusion guidelines.

resultsSix hundred eleven respondents filled in the survey of which 401 could be analyzed, representing 64 countries. Among the respondents, 52% had a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) available at their ICU. In massively bleeding patients, 46% of the respondents used fixed transfusion component ratios. Of those who used fixed blood ratios, the 1:1:1 ratio (red blood cell [RBC] concentrates: plasma: platelet concentrates) was most commonly used (33%). The presence of an MTP was associated with a more frequent use of fixed ratios (p < .001). For RBC transfusion in the general non-massively bleeding ICU population, a hemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 7.0[7.0-7.3] g/dl was reported. In the general ICU population, a platelet count threshold of 50[26-50] × 10 DISCUSSION: Half of the centers had no massive transfusion protocol available. Transfusion practice in massively bleeding critically ill patients is highly variable and driven by the presence of an MTP. In the general non-massively bleeding ICU population restrictive transfusion triggers were chosen.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionCritical IllnessErythrocyte TransfusionHemorrhageHumansIntensive Care UnitsSurveys and Questionnairesbleedingcoagulationcritically illmassivetransfusiontransfusion anemia

Identifiers

PMID34971005
PMCPMC9305497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.