ArticleEcoHealth2021
Metagenomic Analysis Reveals Previously Undescribed Bat Coronavirus Strains in Eswatini.
Article in EcoHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection and complete genome characterisation of bat coronaviruses from Ghana.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Characterizing the parvovirome of Swazi bats: novel species, highly divergent lineages, endogenous viral elements, and taxonomic challenges.Virus evolution · 2026Article
- Detection and genetic characterization of alphacoronaviruses in co-roosting bat species, southeastern Kenya.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Human interactions with bats and bat coronaviruses in rural Côte d'Ivoire.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Article
- Targeted genomic sequencing with probe capture for discovery and surveillance of coronaviruses in bats.eLife · 2022Article
- Detection of Alpha- and Betacoronaviruses in Frugivorous and Insectivorous Bats in Nigeria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the prevalence of coronaviruses in 44 bats from four families in northeastern Eswatini using high-throughput sequencing of fecal samples. We found evidence of coronaviruses in 18% of the bats. We recovered full or near-full-length genomes from two bat species: Chaerephon pumilus and Afronycteris nana, as well as additional coronavirus genome fragments from C. pumilus, Epomophorus wahlbergi, Mops condylurus, and Scotophilus dinganii. All bats from which we detected coronaviruses were captured leaving buildings or near human settlements, demonstrating the importance of continued surveillance of coronaviruses in bats to better understand the prevalence, diversity, and potential risks for spillover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.